State Superior Court Judge Francis B. Schultz found that some elements of the 17-year-old law are unconstitutional. Among them: a low threshold of evidence _ just a "preponderance" _ to get a restraining order violates due process protections. Instead, judges need "clear and convincing" evidence to issue a restraining order, Schultz said....Judge's ruling on restraining orders draws concern -- Newsday.com
I have a restraining order against me by a woman who is abusing the justice system and our children. She made false allegations in court to get the order. It is way to easy to manipulate the nj justice system by scumbag women who will do anything and hurt anyone (including their own children) to be the big winner in court.
ReplyDeleteWAIT...THE JUDGE who denied Dr. AMY CASTILLO the right to protect her three small children, did so because he believed there was no "Clear and Convincing Evidence" that Mark Castillo presented a danger to them. I guess the only clear and convincing evidence he would accept are their tiny deceased bodies after their father drowned every one of them in a high-rise hotel bath during his "visitation" this spring. I recently saw a sign that "A gun is easier to get than a restraining order". NO WONDER MIRANDA Lambert's song is top ten all summer. FALSE ALLEGATIONS YOU SAY???
ReplyDeleteAllegations are False in 1.3% of cases
Dallam. S. J., & Silberg, J. L. (Jan/Feb 2006).
WOMEN are violent too, you say??
Women are victims in 95% of DV cases
MALE victim STATS include
MALE victims of their MALE
Partners in Homosexual Unions
Other Male victims INCLUDE
Mmen hurt by
Their Partners in acts of
SELF DEFENSE
-US Bureau of Justice Crime Statistics
ISSUE #3 Battered Women are not BIG WINNERs in AMERICAN FAMILY COURTS...and IF ALL of the men who said they were FRAMED were telling the truth, there'd be NO NEED for Restraining Orders AND FOUR women wouldn't be dead EVERY DAY. US Bureau of Justice Crime STATS.
The previous anonymous poster obviously never met my ex-wife.
ReplyDeleteShe attacked me with weapons in front of the kids, and still got custody.
She got caught lying in court, and still got a restraining order against me because I "might" be hiding in the woods near the house.
She had my visitation restricted because I couldn't afford a three bedroom apartment with the less than half my net income that was left after paying child support, health insurance for the kids, HER debts, and HER legal fees.
Before the feds got involved in child support, the purpose of child support was for the parents to share the responsibility for providing for their children's needs.
Now the purpose of child support is to provide the lifestyle that the children would have (presumedly) enjoyed in an intact relationship.
It isn't about child support anymore.
It's about power, control, and greed by maximizing child support awards in order for the state to collect more federal money for child support "enforcement".
http://true-equality.110mb.com/reports/CSPIA_Abuses_Report.pdf
You can really tell how unjust the family courts are and how messed up the child support system is when a non-custodial father is driven to this extreme.
ReplyDeletehttp://freekeene.com/2011/06/16/thomas-james-ball-self-immolated-in-protest-of-the-justice-system/